000293941 001__ 293941
000293941 005__ 20250213113256.0
000293941 037__ $$aARTICLE
000293941 245__ $$aMerger control procedures and institutions$$ba comparison of EU and U.S. practice
000293941 269__ $$a2014
000293941 336__ $$aJournal Articles
000293941 520__ $$aThe object of this article is to discuss and compare the role that different constituencies play in U.S. and EU procedures for merger control. We describe the main constituencies (both internal and external)involved in merger control in both jurisdictions and discuss how a typical merger case would be handled under these procedures. At each stage, we consider how the procedure unfolds, which parties are involved, and how they can affect the procedure. Our discussion reveals a very different ecology. EU and U.S. procedures differ in terms of their basic design and in terms of the procedures that are naturally associated with these alternative designs.
000293941 580__ $$aIn: the Antitrust Bulletin. - Volume 59(2014), no. 1, pages 55-109
000293941 700__ $$aKovacic, William E.
000293941 700__ $$aMavroidis, Petros C.
000293941 700__ $$aNeven, Damien
000293941 8564_ $$94a6cce2b-cb41-4f79-a4c3-8ecc7993a71a$$s1299836$$uhttps://repository.graduateinstitute.ch/record/293941/files/AT_Neven_2014.pdf
000293941 901__ $$uInternational Economics Department$$0319285
000293941 909CO $$ooai:repository.graduateinstitute.ch:293941$$pGLOBAL_SET$$pIHEID:Explore
000293941 937__ $$aARTICLE-2016-063
000293941 980__ $$aARTICLE