TY - GEN AB - The object of this article is to discuss and compare the role that different constituencies play in U.S. and EU procedures for merger control. We describe the main constituencies (both internal and external)involved in merger control in both jurisdictions and discuss how a typical merger case would be handled under these procedures. At each stage, we consider how the procedure unfolds, which parties are involved, and how they can affect the procedure. Our discussion reveals a very different ecology. EU and U.S. procedures differ in terms of their basic design and in terms of the procedures that are naturally associated with these alternative designs. AU - Kovacic, William E. AU - Mavroidis, Petros C. AU - Neven, Damien DA - 2014 ID - 293941 L1 - https://repository.graduateinstitute.ch/record/293941/files/AT_Neven_2014.pdf L2 - https://repository.graduateinstitute.ch/record/293941/files/AT_Neven_2014.pdf L4 - https://repository.graduateinstitute.ch/record/293941/files/AT_Neven_2014.pdf LK - https://repository.graduateinstitute.ch/record/293941/files/AT_Neven_2014.pdf N2 - The object of this article is to discuss and compare the role that different constituencies play in U.S. and EU procedures for merger control. We describe the main constituencies (both internal and external)involved in merger control in both jurisdictions and discuss how a typical merger case would be handled under these procedures. At each stage, we consider how the procedure unfolds, which parties are involved, and how they can affect the procedure. Our discussion reveals a very different ecology. EU and U.S. procedures differ in terms of their basic design and in terms of the procedures that are naturally associated with these alternative designs. PY - 2014 T1 - Merger control procedures and institutionsa comparison of EU and U.S. practice TI - Merger control procedures and institutionsa comparison of EU and U.S. practice UR - https://repository.graduateinstitute.ch/record/293941/files/AT_Neven_2014.pdf Y1 - 2014 ER -