TY - GEN AB - A recurring puzzle to many academics and some policymakers is why impact evaluations, which have become something of a cottage industry in the development field, have so little impact on actual policymaking. In this paper, I study the impact of impact evaluations. I show, in a simple Bayesian framework embedded within a standard contest success function-based model of competition amongst anti-evaluation policymakers, Bayesian policymakers, and frequentist evaluators,that the likelihood of a program being cancelled is a decreasing function both of the impact estimated by the evaluation and of the prior on whose basis the program was approved to begin with. Moreover, the probability of cancellation is a decreasing function of the effectiveness of the influence exerted by frequentist evaluators. Since the latter’s effectiveness in terms of lobbying in favor of their findings in the real world is likely to be close to zero, the likelihood of cancelling a program that was approved in the first place, despite its suffering a highly negative evaluation, is extremely low. The model thus provides one possible explanation for why impact evaluations have so little impact in the realm of decisionmaking, and why they have contributed so little to evidence-based policymaking. AU - Arcand, Jean-Louis L CY - Clermont-Ferrand DA - 2013 DA - 2013 ID - 283799 L1 - https://repository.graduateinstitute.ch/record/283799/files/Arcand%20-%20Impact%20of%20Impact-2013.pdf L1 - https://repository.graduateinstitute.ch/record/283799/files/Arcand%20-%20Impact%20of%20Impact-2013.pdf?subformat=pdfa L2 - https://repository.graduateinstitute.ch/record/283799/files/Arcand%20-%20Impact%20of%20Impact-2013.pdf L2 - https://repository.graduateinstitute.ch/record/283799/files/Arcand%20-%20Impact%20of%20Impact-2013.pdf?subformat=pdfa L4 - https://repository.graduateinstitute.ch/record/283799/files/Arcand%20-%20Impact%20of%20Impact-2013.pdf L4 - https://repository.graduateinstitute.ch/record/283799/files/Arcand%20-%20Impact%20of%20Impact-2013.pdf?subformat=pdfa LK - https://repository.graduateinstitute.ch/record/283799/files/Arcand%20-%20Impact%20of%20Impact-2013.pdf LK - https://repository.graduateinstitute.ch/record/283799/files/Arcand%20-%20Impact%20of%20Impact-2013.pdf?subformat=pdfa N2 - A recurring puzzle to many academics and some policymakers is why impact evaluations, which have become something of a cottage industry in the development field, have so little impact on actual policymaking. In this paper, I study the impact of impact evaluations. I show, in a simple Bayesian framework embedded within a standard contest success function-based model of competition amongst anti-evaluation policymakers, Bayesian policymakers, and frequentist evaluators,that the likelihood of a program being cancelled is a decreasing function both of the impact estimated by the evaluation and of the prior on whose basis the program was approved to begin with. Moreover, the probability of cancellation is a decreasing function of the effectiveness of the influence exerted by frequentist evaluators. Since the latter’s effectiveness in terms of lobbying in favor of their findings in the real world is likely to be close to zero, the likelihood of cancelling a program that was approved in the first place, despite its suffering a highly negative evaluation, is extremely low. The model thus provides one possible explanation for why impact evaluations have so little impact in the realm of decisionmaking, and why they have contributed so little to evidence-based policymaking. PB - Fondation pour les études et recherches sur le développement international PP - Clermont-Ferrand PY - 2013 PY - 2013 T1 - The (lack of) impact of impact: why impact evaluations seldom lead to evidence-based policymaking TI - The (lack of) impact of impact: why impact evaluations seldom lead to evidence-based policymaking UR - https://repository.graduateinstitute.ch/record/283799/files/Arcand%20-%20Impact%20of%20Impact-2013.pdf UR - https://repository.graduateinstitute.ch/record/283799/files/Arcand%20-%20Impact%20of%20Impact-2013.pdf?subformat=pdfa Y1 - 2013 ER -