Violence and control in civil conflict: Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza

What explains the use of selective and indiscriminate violence in Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza from 1987 to 2005? Using micro-level data, an aggregated analysis indicates that areas of dominant but incomplete territorial control consistently experience more frequent and intense episodes of selective violence, providing support for Stathis Kalyvas's theory on the logic of civil violence. Disaggregating the analysis by each zone of control and perpetrator, however, offers only mixed empirical support for Kalyvas's predictions. While Palestinian-perpetrated violence is still consistent with theoretical expectations, Israel more frequently resorts to the use of selective violence where Palestinians exercise greater control. Such disconfirming evidence points to causal mechanisms previously unaccounted for and contributes to a more nuanced specification of the microfoundations of violence in civil conflict.

Publication year:
In: Comparative politics. - New York. - Vol. 44(2011), no. 1, p. 61-80

Note: The status of this file is: restricted

 Record created 2012-04-12, last modified 2019-09-09

Download fulltext

Rate this document:

Rate this document:
(Not yet reviewed)